Protest Navy Dump Site
Protest Navy Dump Site
Those who participated Sunday afternoon in a cruise to Fishers Island protesting the Navy's dumping of contaminated material from Connecticut into Long Island Sound saw why the Concerned Citizens of Montauk and others consider it a local issue.
From Montauk Harbor, it took less than an hour for the Viking Star and its 105 protesters to get to the Race, the often turbulent passage between Long Island and Block Island Sounds. To the east was Fishers Island.
Dozens of lobster pot buoys could be seen between the boat and the island. Visible to the north was the coast of Connecticut, where the Thames River, source of the contamination, passes by the city of New London. The riverbank is home to General Dynamics' electric boat division, builder of the Navy's new Sea Wolf submarines, and to a 600-acre Navy base where the subs will lie when completed.
Dredge Disposal
It is also home to 11 Federal Superfund sites - areas considered by the Environmental Protection Agency to be polluted enough to require prolonged and expensive cleanup. The bottomland around several piers on the Navy base is being dredged, and it is the disposal of that material that is under fire.
"I figure if they can spend $4 billion for each Sea Wolf submarine, they can spend a little more to dispose of this stuff responsibly," said Rav Freidel, who, with Julie Evans, organized the anti-dumping protest for the Concerned Citizens.
The small flotilla of supporting fishing boats that organizers had hoped would join the protest, did not materialize. East Hampton Town officials, and those vying for their seats in November's election, did, however. A harbormaster was heard to quip that should the Viking sink, "We wouldn't have an election."
Three Wreaths
A plane that had flown the length of the South Fork passed over the Fishers Island-bound boat towing a sign that read: "U.S. Navy, Don't Muck Up Our Fish." The plane proceeded to New London, then returned to its Westhampton base by passing over the North Fork. A news helicopter hovered.
By the time the protest boat reached the Race, it had been joined by seven boats. The moment had come, and was recorded by video cameras. As though on cue, the sun dipped below a cloud to light up signs and three wreaths.
The latter, bearing the messages "In Memory of Our Lobsters," "In Memory of Our Mollusks," and "Don't Muck Up Our Fish," were ceremoniously cast upon the water. The ceremony was accompanied by an explanation of its necessity, read over a loudspeaker by C.C.O.M.'s president, William Akin.
Prime Fishing Grounds
Mr. Freidel said C.C.O.M. was not opposed to the Sea Wolf program, or the dredging, for that matter, but to the manner and location of the disposal. One million cubic yards of dredged materials known to contain heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and even dioxin, one of the most dangerous poisons ever created, have already been dumped less than two miles off Fishers Island, and another million cubic yards are to be added this year.
The dump site lies in prime fishing grounds that contain as many as 3,000 lobster pots, a number of them tended by East End lobstermen. Local sport fishermen angle there for striped bass and bluefish. A summer flounder (fluke) farm is located less than 10 miles to the west.
Strong tidal currents are known to rake the bottom, and the Navy has admitted that as much as one third of the material dumped last year is no longer on the site. The fear is that the dumped contaminants will be consumed by fish that eat other fish, and move on along the food chain to the dining table.
Which Law Governs?
A suit filed two years ago by C.C.O.M., the Fishers Island Conservancy, and a number of other fishing and environmental groups against the Navy, the E.P.A., the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection failed to stop the first phase of the dumping, which was completed last winter.
Congressman Michael P. Forbes, who is a party to the suit, has drafted legislation to close what he says are loopholes in the nation's ocean-dumping law. Advocates, however, claim dumping in Long Island Sound is controlled by older and far more liberal laws than the Federal Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972.
Whether or not the Sound is indeed regulated by what is commonly known as the Dumping Act may well be decided on Oct. 15, when Justice Thomas Platt meets with defendants and plaintiffs in Federal District Court in Uniondale. Opponents claim the dumping violates a 1992 amendment to the Dumping Act.
No Dioxin Check
Mr. Freidel said he was not at liberty to discuss continuing negotiations between defendants and plaintiffs in the suit. However, he said dumping opponents had strong evidence showing Government agencies knew of the existence of contaminants at levels much higher than permitted by law, and that one of them was dioxin.
Despite this, the final dredging-permit application filed with the Army Corps of Engineers indicated no tests for dioxin had been made, Mr. Freidel said.
"Let's say the other side winced a lot," Mr. Freidel said of the recent negotiations.
Protesters hope the talks will end in a cessation of dumping in favor of other disposal techniques.